Goal Seven


Ensure Environmental Sustainability

Olivia Collins, Mike Minasi and Will Thompson
Photo Courtesy of Matt Miller 


Introduction


Environmental Sustainability can be defined as using natural resources wisely and protecting the complex ecosystems on which society depends (United Nations, 2005, 30.) Ensuring environmental sustainability in all of its aspects is a tall order, and Goal 7 is one of the most complex Millennium Development Goals.  Since the issues are so numerous and widespread, the UN broke down this goal into a few more manageable segments in order to better attack each aspect of the greater problem individually. 




Goal 7 - Ensure Environmental Sustainability is comprised of 4 targets and 10 indicators.  The targets which are labeled from 7.A to 7.D, address a myriad of problems ranging from resource and biodiversity loss to access to clean water and improving the lives of slum dwellers.  The indicators, which are labeled from 7.1 to 7.10, are categorized under the 4 targets and provide a more in depth means for analyzing the progress of each. 




Target 7.A: Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes and reverse the loss of environmental resources.


            7.1 Proportion of land area covered by forest


            7.2 CO2 Emissions, total, per capita per $1 GDP (PPP)


            7.3 Consumption of ozone-depleting substances


            7.4 Proportion of fish stocks within safe biological limits


            7.5 Proportion of total water resources used




Target 7.B: Reduce biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010, a significant reduction in the rate of loss


            7.6 Proportion of terrestrial and marine areas protected


            7.7 Proportion of species threatened with extinction


Target 7.C: Halve, by 2015, the proportion of the population without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation


            7.8 Proportion of population using an improved drinking water source


            7.9 Proportion of population using an improved sanitation facility


Target 7.D: Achieve, by 2020, a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers


            7.10 Proportion of urban population living in slums




            These 4 targets and 10 indicators aim to ensure environmental sustainability in all developing countries of the world.  They all work towards improving different aspects of the environment that are becoming affected by our world’s growing population and demands.  Millennium Development Goal 7 - Ensure Environmental Sustainability while the most complex, may also be one of the most important.  The environment is present in every aspect of life, and making sure we maintain it and keep it sustainable is the only way this world will continue to thrive.


Historical Development


 Before the specific indicators and targets were established for sustainable development   a series of global environmental conferences were held. These conferences have outlined the current global model for natural resource protection and environmental well-being. 


The link between economic development and environmental degradation was first presented in 1972 at the UN conference on the Human Environment, held in Stockholm.   Following this conference, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP,) was created to launch and facilitate action to protect the environment.  Despite this initiative, little would change in economic planning and decision making to incorporate environmental protection during succeeding years.  The natural world, unlike the global economy, suffered the most as ozone depletion, climate change, water pollution and destruction of natural resources continued at an alarming rate.


By 1983, the UN established the World Commission on Environment and Development.  Environmental degradation, which was only seen as a side effect of industrialized wealth, became clear that it reached a broader scale and was understood as a matter of the survival of developing nations. 


The targets for ensuring environmental sustainability were first laid out by The World Summit for Children in 1990.  The World Summit for Children was a large gathering of leaders coming together to create a promise to children. Here, 71 heads of State and Government and 88 other senior officials, created a plan known as a Declaration on Survival, Protection and Development of children and a Plan of Action for implementing this Declaration. (UNICEF 1990).  The Declaration was made up of six different goals, one of them calling for universal access to safe water and sanitary services in regards to goal 7, primarily environmental protection.  The next key meeting was the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992, commonly known as the ‘Earth Summit’ or the ‘Rio Summit.’  This was a two week meeting was held in Brazil and it’s biggest message was that if individuals will change the way they think or act, the necessary changes that we need would happen. Here, the Government realized that when making economic decisions, international and national policies need to take into consideration the environmental impact they will have.  This meeting brought many environmental issues to the table, gathering widespread public attention.  The ‘Earth Summit’ had a lasting impact and have impacted and influenced other conferences of the UN to focus on the need for environmental sustainability.  In 1994, there was an International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) at Cairo. At this Conference in Cairo, world leaders came to a conclusion that, “population is not just about counting people, but about making sure that everyone counts.” (UNFPA 1994).




The Development Assistance Committee (DAC) is a committee created by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD.) The DAC is comprised of 29 members, who are large donors of aid throughout the world. In 1985 the DAC held a meeting in France at the Chateau de la Muette, where there was much discussion regarding the weak support for long-term development. (Hulme 2007, 13)  Out of this meeting also came two other things; the Development Partnership in the New Global Context which argued that agreeing to development is not a bad expense but a good investment.  The second was a proposal for a Groupe de Reflexion, by the European Union, to act as a check and balance for the DAC, it was soon approved and put into action. Soon after, they began to gather and meet, during a meeting they reviewed declarations that were decided upon at UN Summits to maybe find something more out of them. (Hulme 2007, 14)  The Group de Reflexion  had an impact on the DAC’s International Development Goals.  They found that a UN Summit Goal had failed to enter the IDG listing, the 1992 Human Development Report’s 20/20 initiative that was agreed on at the World Summit on Social Development in 1995. This initiative was not present in the DAC.  The 20/20 initiative asked national governments in developing countries to provide 20% of their public expenditure to basic social services and on aid donors to match this by providing 20% of aid budgets to these services. (Hulme 2007 ,15) In doing this, it was believed that this would guarantee that the resources would be available to provide universal coverage in primary education, primary health care, nutrition support programs and safe water and sanitation.




In 1997, the Kyoto Protocol was created, an agreement on binding emission reduction targets, this Protocol began action in 2005. (UNFCCC 2005). Developed nations were expected to carry more responsibility for reductions than developing nations, because they produce more emissions and have more resources to eliminate them. In a 2001 meeting, both World Bank and senior UN managers noted the lack of an explicit goal holding the North accountable to its levels of development assistance, which brought significant addition to goal 8 during final negotiations, identifying essential policy changes.  After the MDG’s were agreed upon, almost entirely, there was a note in the back of a 60 page document calling for further refinement of the indicators for goals 7 and 8.  Not surprisingly, these were the two goals that most affected the promises, which the United States and other nations promised to uphold and desired some flexibility.


                                         Current Status





Target 7.A: Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes and reverse the loss of environmental resources. 




            7.1 Proportion of land area covered by forest:




Currently, around 30% of the world’s land is covered by forests; however we have seen a rapid decline in the percent of forests due to deforestation.  Out of the 30% of land that is covered by forests, around 75% of them have national forest programmes in place.  Unfortunately, natural programs are unable to control deforestation, because reasons for it are out of their control.  There are different reasons as to why forests are cut down; a major reason for their destruction is to allow more space for agriculture.  The world’s population is growing and demand for more everything is growing with it.  While it is difficult to put a monetary value on natural capital, it is a vital component and driving factor of sustainable livelihood, especially in developing nations, where they rely heavily on natural resources for their way of life.  The rural poor rely on forests as their ‘safety nets,’ therefore they feel the worst pain caused by deforestation.  Forests are beneficial to reducing poverty and create better lives for the rural poor by, “providing food, wood fuel, medicines and other non-wood products used in the households of millions of the world’s poorest people or sold in traditional or informal sectors.”(MDG Report 2013,  44 )




Throughout the last twenty years, there has been a decrease in global deforestation rates, down from 8.3 million hectares to 5.2 million hectares annually.  Some of the national forest programs that were created (tree planting, natural restoration) help add around seven million hectares of new forests each year.  The only continent to have significant net forest gain was Asia, where major afforestation programs were carried out in China, India, and Vietnam increasing forest area over 2.2 million hectares between 1990 and 2010.  These three countries were able to increase their forest cover by four million hectares annually; where as other countries in the region are continuing their use of forests for other reasons. (MDG Report 2013, p. 44)  Continents reporting the greatest loss of forest area include Africa and South America, at an annual rate of 3.4 million and 3.6 million hectares respectively.  




Millennium Development Goal Target 7.A Indicator 1; will not be met.




            7.2 CO2 Emissions, total, per capita per $1 GDP (PPP)




Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are a greenhouse gas emissions caused by human activities.  Burning of fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil as well as abuse of land, and creation of industries are all human activities that cause CO2 emissions. (MDG Report 2013, p. 45)  The world’s emissions of CO2 have grown over 46% since 1990.  This increase in emissions is caused by developing countries rapid growth.  However, even though developing countries produce the most CO2 emissions, when we look at per capita emissions developed countries are in the lead.  In developed regions, per capita levels are more than three times higher than per capita levels in developing regions (11 metric tons per person compared to only 3, respectively) but in regards to emissions per unit of economic output the developing world produces .6 kilograms of CO2 per dollar, relative to .4 kilograms in developed regions (MDG report 2013, p. 45) Although the international community continues to make steps towards combating climate change and the increase of greenhouse gas emissions, we are still way above the level for planetary well-being and stability.  Many developing countries can combat climate change by implementing sustainable policies as part of their natural energy plan.  Costa Rica is trying to be carbon neutral by 2025.  At the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Doha, Qatar, major actions were taken.  There was a second commitment period from 2013-2020 with the Kyoto Protocol.  The Climate Change Convention and Kyoto Protocol are attempting to fortify national mitigation efforts.




Despite a drop in global CO2 emissions in 2009 by 0.4 percent from the previous year, as of 2010 the world’s carbon emissions were around 31.7%, an increase of 5% between 2009 and 2010. The increase of emissions is caused from the fast growth in developing regions.   In developing regions, their CO2 emissions rose by 7% from 2009 to 2010, and only 3% in developed countries.  Developing areas slowed down their CO2 emissions from 10 percent in 2003-2004 to 5.4 percent in 2009.  Overall, this increase was offset by the reduction of CO2 levels in developed countries. (MDG Report 2013, p.45)




Millennium Development Goal Target 7.A Indicator 2; will not be met




            7.3 Consumption of ozone-depleting substances




Ozone gas is apparent in both the Earth’s upper atmosphere as well as the ground level, and ozone depletion occurs every day and can have many negative effects on our planet.  When ozone is depleted it allows large amounts of UV radiation to hit the earth, which has many poor health effects on human beings, as well as agricultural crops and marine life.




There have been steps taken to decrease the amount of ozone-depleting substances;   The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, is one of them.  This Protocol aims to decrease the amount of ozone-depleting substances that are consumed and produced. By doing this, the Protocol hopes that it would also reduce the number of substances in the atmosphere and eventually fortify the earth’s ozone layer. (UNEP, http://ozone.unep.org/new_site/en/index.php)




Millennium Development Goal Target 7.A Indicator 3; will not be met




            7.4 Proportion of fish stocks within safe biological limits




Fish accounts for 15% of almost 3 billion people’s animal protein intake, therefore it is important to maintain the quality of fisheries.  Fisheries play an important role in maintaining the global food supply as well as serve the livelihoods for over 200 million people in developing countries and most of Asia.  Although widespread, the growing population is triggering fisheries to become overexploited and the amount of stocks of marine fish are below the level where they are able to produce their highest amount of sustainable yields.  Throughout the past 40 years, there has been an expansion of the fishing industry which has caused a serious decline in the condition of global fisheries.  While there are policies and types of management created by coastal states, it has been hard to maintain the condition of the fisheries. Overfishing in these fisheries is not only detrimental due to the possibility of a food shortage, but also for ecological reasons.  These areas, like most ecosystems, are quite complex and need to maintain a sense of equilibrium.  When overfishing occurs, one major aspect of this ecosystem is decreased.  This could trigger any number of things, which could upset the delicate balance which is heavily driven by food demand. (MDG Report 2013, p. 46)




As of 2009, 30% of marine fish were misused and not contained in their safe biological limits, a 20% rise since 1974. In 2006, the world’s food fish production was around 110 million tons.  Not only do fisheries play an important role in maintaining the global food supply, they also serve as the livelihoods for over 200 million people in developing countries and most of Asia.  Although widespread, the growing population is triggering fisheries to become overexploited.  The Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean and Black Sea all contain the highest percent of overfished stocks; more than 50% of these stocks are not in their biological limits.  The Pacific Ocean contains the smallest percent of overfished stocks resting at around 10%. (MDG Report 2013, p. 46)




The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has reviewed 584 fish stocks worldwide, and of that 584, 52 percent were classified as fully exploited.  This means that they are catching fish at their maximum sustainable limits.  Therefore the option of expansion to appease the growing population is out of the question.  Furthermore, another 28 percent of these fisheries were classified as overexploited.  This indicates that fish were being caught at a faster rate than they were reproducing which resulted in a depleted population.  This is dangerous because as the population of fish decreases due to higher demand from the population, the threat of a food shortage becomes evident.  Only about 20 percent of all fisheries examined were considered underexploited.




Millennium Development Goal Target 7.A Indicator 4; will not be met.




            7.5 Proportion of total water resources used




Total water sources are made up of the amount of groundwater and surface water taken from their sources by a human.  This is important to address because it gives a check on the amount of water sources that are demanded to meet the needs of a country.  Water is become scarce, and the over utilization of it can result in negative sustainable effects, and if there is under utilization, it shows that there can be improvement in sustainable water use. 




Millennium Development Goal Target 7.A Indicator 5; will not be met.




Target 7.B: Reduce biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010, a significant reduction in the rate of loss




            7.6 Proportion of terrestrial and marine areas protected




In order to reduce biodiversity loss, we need to increase the amount of terrestrial and marine areas that we are protecting.  By protecting areas, we have more ability to conserve and nurture biological diversity. (MDG Report 2013, p. 46)  Areas that are protected are able to create crucial ecosystem goods and services that are valuable to local, national, and global economies.  A large percent of the earth’s population require protected areas in order to maintain their livelihoods. 




Protected terrestrial areas grew from 8.9% to 14.6% between 1990 and 2012, and marine protection has doubled in coastal waters (12 nautical miles) from 4.6% to 9.7%.  There was a Convention on Biological Diversity that was held when the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services become apparent.  This Convention, by 2020 aims to conserve at the least; 17% of world’s terrestrial areas, and 10% of marine areas.  They would do this “through a global protected area network that is effectively and equitably managed and ecologically representative of the earth’s natural resources.” (MDG Report 2013, p. 46)  While many countries need to improve, Latin America is doing the best with their conservation of land and marine areas, with 21.3% of it terrestrial land protected and 15.4% of its marine areas. (MDG Report 2013, p. 46)




Millennium Development Goal Target 7.B Indicator 6; will not be met.




            7.7 Proportion of species threatened with extinction




Due to the large number of species facing the threat of extinction, the world is facing a huge reduction in biodiversity.  This causes pain to the world’s population because of the serious issues it imposes on the ecosystem services that individuals rely on. The Union for Conservation of Nature along with others created what is known as the Red List Index.  The Red List Index contains measurements of the trends in extinction rates of different species, including, birds, mammals, amphibians, and warm-water reef-building corals.  As of 2012, this index indicates that birds are declining the same amount or a little quicker than the past.  Two countries, Denmark and Sweden have had success in reducing their possibility of extinction of some species.  Key habitats of most threatened species are not being protected.  Half of the world’s most imperative terrestrial sites for species conservation have remained unprotected.  It seems that people would rather use these areas for themselves because of all the benefits they can derive from the utilization of this land.  Because of this, the number of species that are facing the threat of extinction is growing day by day, especially in developing countries, which lack the infrastructure to create successful protected areas. (MDG Report 2013, p.47/48)




Millennium Development Goal Target 7.B Indicator 7; will not be met by 2015.




Target 7.C: Halve, by 2015, the proportion of the population without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation




            7.8 Proportion of population using an improved drinking water source




As of 2010, 89% of the global population are using improved water sources, a 13% rise from 1990, which accounts for around 2.1 billion people.  While the number has increased, there are some areas where it has not.  In 2011, 86% of population in Caucasus and Central Asia were using increased water sources, which was a 3% drop from 1990.  Countries that had the most improvement were Eastern, Southern, and South-Eastern Asia.  Around 6/10 people that gained access to improved sources are residents of urban areas.  If current trends persist, by 2015, over 90% of the world population will use improved water sources (UNDG 2011, 26.) 




Of the 2.1 billion people affected from 1990 to 2010, China and India have recorded almost half of the global progress, allowing just over 6 million people access to safe water.  On the other hand, 40% of all people without improved drinking water live in sub-Saharan Africa.  Despite this, an additional 238 million Africans are now using safe drinking water (UNDG 2011, 26)  Where there has been great success and the goal has been met according to the World Bank standards, there is still room for great improvement in certain areas.  The number of people in rural areas without an improved water source is five times greater than of that in urban environments. 




In 2011, 768 million people were still receiving their water from a poor water source, the number of individuals living without access to safe drinking water could actually be two to three times greater than what is written on paper. (MDG Report 2013, p. 47)  The number of people without access to improved water source is 636 million, or 83% of the population without access to water. (MDG Report 2013,. 47) Significant progress has been made in the use of piped drinking water, up to 57 percent as of 2008.  While this number has risen only 7 percentage points since 1990, it accounts for an increase of 1.2 billion people having access to safe drinking water.  Health gains are maximized by the use of piping, the highest rung on the drinking water ladder.  Piped drinking water still remains much higher in urban environments, affecting 2.7 billion people compared to a mere 1.2 billion people in rural areas, respectively. 




Millennium Development Goal Target 7.C Indicator 8; was met in 2010, five years ahead of time. 




            7.9 Proportion of population using an improved sanitation facility




While 1.9 billion people have gained access to improved sanitation facilities between the years of 1990 and 2011, this number needs to increase much more.  Examples of improved sanitation facilities are latrines or flush toilets.  1990 showed that less than half of the world’s population had access to improved sanitation facilities and as of 2011,  only 64% of the population has access.  Much improvement was seen in Eastern Asia, a rise of 40% between 1990 and 2011 (27% to 67%.) (MDG Report 2013, 48)  The percent of individuals that perform open defecation decreased by 9% over those 21 years as well, however that 15% is still at risk for serious health issues.  In numbers, it shows that in Easter Asia, 626 million people had begun using improved sanitation facilities in 21 years.  Unfortunately, Sub-Saharan Africa and Oceania are still distantly behind and are not seeing much progress.




While there was a rise in the amount of people that have gain access to improved sanitation facility, many of these individuals were children of parents that already had access to these facilities.  Developing nations have undertaken policies to increase their sanitation facilities.  These policies are implemented through the community-level and aim to put an end to open defecation, around 100 countries “ have taken root and the number of declared ‘open-defecation-free villages’ is rising.” (MDG Report 2013,  49) The UN General Assembly recognized the right to safe and clean water and sanitation and stated that they are an essential human right.




In order to meet the 2015 target, there needs to be a rise of about 1 billion people gaining access to improved sanitation facility, which is a rise from 64% of our population to 75%. Rather than improving sanitation facilities for 240,000 people a day (the amount per day between 1990 and 2011,) it needs to be improved for 660,000 people a day between 2011 and 2015.  In order to do this, experts argue that there are “three priorities; 1. No one should practice open defecation; 2. Everyone should have safe water and sanitation facilities at home and practice good hygiene; 3. All schools and health centers should have water and sanitation, while promoting good hygiene.” (MDG Report 2013, 49)




Millennium Development Goal Target 7.C Indicator 9; will not be met.




Target 7.D: Achieve, by 2020, a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers




            7.10 Proportion of urban population living in slums




The word ‘slums’ is defined as densely populated, urban areas containing sub-standard housing, cramped quarters, and squalor.  Since the implementation of the Millennium Development Goals, the number of people living in slums worldwide has decreased significantly from 39% in the year 2000 down to 33% in the year 2010.  This decrease may not appear to be much until you look at it from the global scale.  This drop indicates that over 200 million slum dwellers have experienced major improvements in their quality of life. Between 2010 and 2012, a two year period, 44 million people were no longer considered to be living in slums.  (MDG Report 2013,  52) These improvements could include access to safe water supplies, overall improvement of sanitation, and more effective, less crowded housing.  These factors all point toward how many countries and governments around the world have made great strides in attempting to improve the quality of life in slums, which drastically increases the chances of countless people to rise out of slum culture and enjoy lives free from poverty, disease, and illiteracy. 


Although successes have been made on a global scale, the number of slum dwellers is actually on the rise in the developing world.  As major cities grow, and more and more people relocate to them in search of new opportunities, more affordable areas become overpopulated and new slums are born.  The number of urban people residing in slum conditions has increased drastically from 650 million in 1990, to 760 million in 2000, to a whopping 863 million in 2012, and statistics show that this number is continually increasing.  (MDG Report 2013, p.52) Northern Africa, Eastern Asia, Southern Asia, and South-Eastern Asia have all seen decreases in their population of slum dwellers.  Sub-Saharan Africa yet again has the least improvement and is still nowhere near where it needs to be, with only a 3% decrease in twelve years from 65% to 62% between 2000 and 2012. 


Millennium Development Goal Target 7.CD Indicator 10; has been met.

Successes and Challenges
Successes


While not all of Goal 7’s targets and indicators have been met or are on track to be met by 2015, there has been success and improvement.  Target 7.C Indicator 8 was met in 2010, 5 years ahead of schedule, with 89% of the world’s population using improved water sources.  Target 7.D Indicator 10 was also met, exceeding the improvement in lives of slum-dwellers by 100 million, double of what it’s goal was. 




In 2012, the Doha Amendment was added to the Kyoto Protocol, with new commitments, including industrialized countries to reduce their emissions by 18% where they were at 1990, between 2013 and 2020. It also included other greenhouse gases that were added to the list of emissions. (UNFCCC 2012)




The Montreal Protocol’s effort to reduce the number of ozone-depleting substances has been one of the most efficient efforts in the reduction of them. Since 1986, there has been a 98% reduction in consumption.  The Protocol is also beneficial to protecting the global climate system. There are a lot of reasons as to why this Protocol was so efficient including, monitoring, exchange of information and an adaptable mechanism. (MDG Report 2013, 14)


 Challenges



With the rapid growth in the world’s population  has further complicated efforts to meet Goal 7’s target and indicators .  There has been a drastic change in population, technology, natural resources, economies and much more since 2000, when the goals were created.  Therefore it is hard to argue if the goals being aimed at were enough and done in the correct way.  It is unfair to measure these goals on a global scale because each country is different and has different allowances and limitations. 




Another challenge of MDG 7 is the amount of focus that was put on water and sanitation, arguably two of the most important necessities of life, and they should not be a privilege but a right. The United Nation General Assembly finally acknowledged the issue in 2010, when they “explicitly recognized the right to safe, clean water and sanitation and acknowledged that they are essential to the realization of all human rights.” (MDG Report 2013, 51) There should have been a separate goal, rather than including them as two small indicators out of the ten included in MDG 7.  More focus needs to be put on this in the future. 




While Target 7.C Indicator was met and was met earlier than planned, there are still some challenges that will be faced.  Although there is progress in piped drinking water, 38% of the 6.2 billion people using improved drinking water sources are still lugging water home from public water areas that are not as sanitary. (MDG Report 2013, p. 49) Despite the high numbers of improved access, the poorest people in society are still the most effected, with the rising cost of water, they are unable to afford the little amounts of bad quality water.  In urban areas, developing countries are growing at such a high rate and urban infrastructure cannot keep pace with urban population growth.  Since 1990, of the 1.9 billion person increase in urban environments, 1.05 of urban dwellers have gained access to safe drinking water.  The amount of people that rely on poor surface water has cut in half from 6% to 3% between 1990 and 2011.  While this is a great drop there are more than 180 million people in the world that, “rely on rivers, streams, ponds or lakes to meet their daily drinking water needs.” (MDG Report 2013,  50) Maintaining a safe urban drinking water environment of 96% is going to be an increasing challenge as urban populations in Asia and Africa are expected to climb by almost three billion people by 2015.  This poses a problem, as water coverage cannot stay on track with urbanization resulting in a gradual increase of those without improved drinking water sources in developing urban areas.




The Millennium Declaration called for water management strategies, at all levels, to promote both equitable access and supply.  The solution for this demand, which was established (outcome) in 2002 at the World Summit on Sustainable Development, was integrated water resources management (IWRM). This management approach has been approved and accepted at the international level for the most efficient system to combat and help sustain this limited global resource.  To assess the current status of IWRM progress the UN-Water (2008a) carried out a survey covering 104 countries.  While many countries have executed the planning process at the national level, there has been little done to execute these plans.  The disconnect between national levels and those at the community and provincial levels, where socioeconomic gains can be made has hindered the progress of IWRM implementation.  One of the most important factors for a successful IWRM framework is integrating all stakeholders in the development process.  This includes a combination of sectors of industry including water management, agriculture, energy and land use planning.  Increased and direct participation from local users is a vital component as well. Some critical gaps analyzed in the World Water Development Report included:


·       Linking water supply and sanitation and water resources management- this includes attention to water supply with water resource management progress.  As well as tools to facilitate stakeholder participation, most specifically (importantly) gender equality because water management at the farm and household level is done by women and lack of access to water and sanitation effects women the most


·       Protecting water quality- integrated water pollution prevention and control approaches to guarantee adequate water quality for human and ecological needs.  Some measures include polluter pays and pollution management systems improved.  Tools also implemented for water quality management at the community level, so community empowerment is represented at the higher level as well as control over their own environment.


·       Improving water use efficiency- improvement of efficiency and technology and financial instruments for water demand management.  The development of operational indicators for water management performance and improved or new infrastructure for sectoral interaction of planning and developing financial/economic decision-making.


·       Linking trans-boundary and national water resources management- tools to address the challenge of shared waters that create dialogue and political will among decision makers.


·       Adapting and improving resilience to climate change and natural hazards through improved water management- these adaptations will most likely be expensive and require contentious policy shifts.  Investment for these projects is important, particularly tools for the assessment of basin risks and adaptation methods in basin planning


·       Summary of key lessons and future measures for accelerated progress countries that are behind schedule need to prioritize IWRM frameworks with the help of the international community.  Once countries have developed plans and policies they must be implemented and evaluation and monitoring must be shared through a global knowledge of management (UNDG 2008, 17-20).




Efforts made to eradicate slum life will need to be doubled by governments worldwide if we want to see any improvements.  Also, there has been a recent, global housing crisis that is projected to renege the progress, which has been made since 1990.  What is worse is that public authorities, due to lack of organization and insufficient funds, products of the recent, global economic crises, have instead exacerbated the problem even more.  In order to fix the damage done to the system, those in charge of housing in urban areas must make efforts to recover land titles and other forms of tenure, secure greater funds which will be used towards subsidized housing, secure greater land area which is to be used for the development of new subsidized housing, and lobby at politicians who have the power to arbitrate the speculation of land and property in the market.  It is because of these shortcomings that the price of land is rising worldwide which completely prevents the possibility for low income peoples to become property owners, forcing them to rent from more affluent land owners who do not have the best interest of their tenants in mind, promoting the growth of urban slums.


More so, the world population is an ever-rising entity.  With this number always climbing, and the global economy in limbo, this target has proven to be almost unreachable.  In addition, newer research has proven that there was a miscalculation when the goals were originally implemented.  Improving the lives of 100 million slum dwellers was believed to be a significant number, and also a very reasonable target to strive for within 20 years, however, it was found in 2003 that, 100 million is only a very small fraction of the world’s slum population.  Also, the slum target is unique in that it was not fathomed as a percentage tied to a particular baseline number, but rather was assigned a specific number.  This method has proven to be a less than effective way to attack this problem because it was applied to the whole world as a whole instead of a regional or country-specific percentage or value, thus creating great difficulty for governments to work toward achieving this goal, because there is nothing relative to base it on in their nation.  This made this goal heavily dependent on the cooperation of national governments and international organizations and donors rather than allowing for the problems to be fixed internally (UNDG 2008).




If the US were a Developing Country




Currently 33.2% of the United States land area is covered by forest, a .9% rise from 1990. In an urban area, the average tree coverage is 21.7%.  The American Forest Foundation (AFF) aims to find ways to protect the United States forests.  The Foundation collaborates with politicians and currently has some projects in the works to maintain forestry.  Some of these are; “Clean Water in New England,”  “Saving the Longleaf Plain,” and “Watershed in Wisconsin.” (AFF 2013)




As of 2011, the number of greenhouse gas emissions of the United States was 6,702 million metric tons of CO2, totally about 84% of the US’s greenhouse gas emissions in total.  There was a decrease between 2010 and 2011 of about 1.6%, arguable due to improvement in fuel efficiency in vehicles, different changes in weather, and electric generation. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforces the Clean Air Act, which is a regulation on emissions. (EPA 2013).  CO2 emissions per capital decreased from 20.2% to 17.6% from 2000 to 2010. (World Bank  2013). The Clean Air Act also aims to reduce the consumption of ozone depleting substances. 




The United States passed the Endangered Species Act in 1973 in order to “protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend.”  This Act is implemented by both the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) as well as the Commerce Department’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The FWS focuses on land and freshwater species, and the NMFS focuses on marine species. (FWS) Currently the number of species that are threatened with extinction is 185 fish, 232 plants, and 26 mammals. (World Bank 2013).




The proportion of terrestrial areas protected remained the same between the years of 2000 and 2012 at 12.4%. The percentage of marine areas protected rose 1.4% from 2000 to 2012, and currently 28.6% of marine areas are protected. The United States has not increased the number of land area protected but also has not lost any protection.  The US has also seen a minimal increase in the protection of sea area.  However, if it were a developing country, the United States would not be on track seeing as it has made little to no improvements of protection. The proportion of population in the United States that are using an improved water source is between 94-100%.  The proportion of population in the United States using an improved sanitation facility is 100%.  (World Bank 2012).








Where do we go from here? Post 2015




Much can be learned from the implementation and progress of the Millennium Development Goals.  While most of the Goals will not be achieved by 2015, the implementation of them has created an increase in the number of people aware of issues in the world.  When looking forward past the 2015 deadlines it is important to keep in mind that there is a constant rapid growth in population which means that there will be more mouths to feed, people to house, brains to enrich, resources to be used, and so on.  This causes a need for more action taken towards ensuring environmental sustainability.  It is important to preserve our environment before resources begin to run out, and individuals are unable to survive.  While development is great and helps with economic stability, it is important that it is done at a rate that maintains stability with the environment.  A balance needs to be found between the two so that there is a way to benefit from both sides.




 Action is being taking in preparation for 2015 and afterwards, to continue working towards the Millennium Development Goals and making sure lives are being improved.  A “Post-2015 agenda” has been put together to move forward towards achieving all of these Goals in the future.  Ensuring environmental sustainability is very important to achieve because every being on Earth will be unable to maintain life if action is not taken.  In 2012, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development was held in Brazil.  At this Conference, “governments renewed their strong political commitment to sustainable development and to promote integration and coherence of policies and the implementation of actions in the social, economic, and environmental areas.” (UNESD 2012).  A process was implemented to create goals known as the Sustainable Development Goals, which will further work on the desired outcomes of the MDGs.  “Open Working Group” was formed made up of 30 members who are the leaders of creating the SDGs, and eight sessions will be held through 2014 to create the optimal goals that will help us further achieve the MDGs.




As of 2013, plans for post-2015 seem to prioritize environmental sustainability and believe that it is an important aspect to focus on. It is hopeful that the “Post-2015 Agenda” and the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals will be beneficial to achieving global success.  While there is much hope for the post-2015 movements, there are some issues of how it will pan out.  It has been discussed that there would be a universal plan put in place that would measure the progress of all countries achievement towards the goals.  However it is uncertain whether or not developed or industrialized countries would be willing to agree to a universal framework.  Another issue is the idea of importance, which goals are more important to achieve or more important to achieve first.  Trying to develop goals that cover all the bases, but also manage to succeed will be difficult.  In regards to funding and donors, a plan needs to be made that will be approved and accepted by them, because they are very important to the plan’s success.   (Higgins, .28) 

No comments:

Post a Comment